Today I thought to find out about clairvoyant or clairaudient overlays onto a video, which is to say, overlays not achieved through technology.

• INTRODUCTION 
• CLAIRVOYANT OR CLAIRAUDIENT OVERLAY ONTO A VIDEO NOT ACHIEVED THROUGH TECHNOLOGY?
  • I asked Google AI about: “clairvoyant or clairaudient overlay onto a video not achieved through technology”
  • DIVING DEEPER
  • I asked Google AI: More about EPV [Electronic Voice Phenomenon]?
  • I asked Google AI: Explain EVP from the standpoint of esoteric lore?
  • I asked Google AI: Suppose the EVP appears to be a direct overlay of living people speaking, or the voices of animals clearly heard speaking English? [as in the case of the clairaudient overlays in my post “How to Get Rid of an Entity Attachment” which is mentioned in the Introduction]
  • Do you suppose clairly gifted persons, as Earth ascends, might utilize camcorders to record distant conversations, much as people speak to each other at a distance today using electronic means such as handhelds? For instance, the camcorder might act like a handheld txt message – an optical recording – of a phone call on the handheld – an auditory recording – that goes to message. Except that in the case of the Ascension-oriented person and the camcorder, a telepathic conversation – the reception and conveyance of ‘thought forms’ – might be converted to an auditory recording on the camcorder? So then the latter would be another instance of conversion of communication from one medium to another, as in the case of voice-to-text, but with a paranormal twist?
• CONCLUSION
• MORE INFORMATION

---

INTRODUCTION

Dear Ones,

I was editing the youtube transcripts for this video today …

Link: “How to Get Rid of an Entity Attachment,” by Alice B. Clagett, filmed on 11 May 2024 and on 12 November 2024 and published on 12 November 2024; revised and youtube video edited on 24 February 2026 … https://wp.me/p2Rkym-zck ..

I got to thinking about the clairaudient overlays in the uncut film at the end of the video, and added quite a bit both to the WordPress post and to the youtube transcript.

I realized that I have been making videos with clairaudient overlays for about a year and a half now, so today I renamed a prior blog category as follows: Clair overlays onto reality – Clairvoyant overlays or sight-overs – Clairaudient overlays or voice-overs ..

There are many more posts to do with this new category than are currently so tagged. Sometimes in past, if the clairaudient overlays were full of mischief, for instance, I would tag them for the category: Black magician – black magicker – subtle sorcerer – thuggee – drukpa (dugpa) – red hat – mantrik – brujo ..

Right now I am editing transcripts for youtube videos published late in the year 2024. From now on, as I edit youtube transcrips, I will add to the related WordPress posts tags for the renamed category.

Meantime, today I thought to ask Google AI what information they might have on clairvoyant or clairaudient overlays onto a video, which is to say, overlays not achieved through technology.

There is a big debate in the scientific community as to the nature of what are claimed to be clair overlays on electronic media. Some suggest these are hoaxes.

As far as my videos are concerned, I can attest that none of these are hoaxes. That leaves two contenders for the crown:

• The notion that electronic devices may have greater range of recording sensitivity
  than do human eyes and ears,
• And the notion that these are purely paranormal events.

Both these notions have merit.

Here is the intriguing Q&A with Google AI …

---

CLAIRVOYANT OR CLAIRAUDIENT OVERLAY ONTO A VIDEO NOT ACHIEVED THROUGH TECHNOLOGY?

Dear Ones,

I asked Google AI about: “clairvoyant or clairaudient overlay onto a video not achieved through technology”

Google AI said: The phenomenon of a clairvoyant (visual) or clairaudient (auditory) overlay onto a video, not achieved through intentional post-production technology, is generally discussed in terms of paranormal, spiritual, or supernatural evidence. This often involves recording devices capturing phenomena that are invisible or inaudible to the human eye/ear in real-time. 

Here is a breakdown of how this is categorized and understood:

1. The “Non-Technology” Premise

If the visual/auditory overlay is not artificial, it is generally attributed to the recording device (camera/microphone) having a higher sensitivity to energy fields than human senses.

• Clairvoyant Overlay: Images of “ghosts,” apparitions, or light orbs that appear on camera but were not seen by the human eye at the time of recording.
• Clairaudient Overlay: Sounds, voices, or messages (Electronic Voice Phenomena or EVP) that are heard upon playback of a recording, which were not audible during the original recording. 

2. Theoretical Explanations

• Metaphysical Trace: A theory that a camera captures a “faded echo” or “metaphysical trace” of a person, event, or entity that is invisible to the normal eye but exists in a non-physical spectrum.
• High-Sensitivity Capture: Some believe that cameras and microphones can record energy or frequencies that exceed the perception of human consciousness.
• Auditory Pareidolia: Scientists explain clairaudient overlays (EVP) as the brain trying to find familiar patterns—such as voices—in random, chaotic noises (static, wind, electronics), a phenomenon known as pareidolia.
• Environmental Artifacts: Many “unexplained” overlays are often found to be natural, such as lens flares, dust particles reflecting light, or low-frequency hums being interpreted as voices. 

3. Historical and Contextual Examples

• Spirit Photography/Film: Emerging with the invention of cameras, this involved capturing faint, translucent figures that were attributed to spiritual entities.
• EVP (Electronic Voice Phenomena): First popularized by Attila von Szalay in the 1950s, who claimed to record voices of the dead on magnetic tape. 

4. Skeptical Perspectives

• Hoax Potential: It is noted that almost no digital video or audio, especially if “surprising,” can be definitively proven to be non-technological (i.e., not a hoax or editing trick).
• Psychological Factors: The perception of these phenomena is closely tied to the observer’s belief system and expectations, leading to misinterpretation of natural, chaotic stimuli. 

In summary, a “non-technological” clairvoyant or clairaudient overlay is typically interpreted as a paranormal or energetic interaction that is captured by a device, whereas skepticism defines it as psychological interpretation of sensory artifacts (auditory/visual pareidolia).

---

DIVING DEEPER

Google AI said: In the context of paranormal research and spiritualism, achieving a “clairvoyant” (visual) or “clairaudient” (auditory) overlay on video without using modern digital technology or editing software typically refers to methods where the recording medium itself is believed to capture a “metaphysical trace” or “faded echo” of a subject’s energy. 

Non-Technical “Overlay” Methods

These techniques rely on the belief that spiritual energy can interact directly with physical recording components:

• Film-Based “Spirit Photography”: Historically, spiritualists used film photography rather than digital, believing that silver halide crystals in the film could respond to spiritual frequencies. This results in “ghosting” effects—soft blurs or light streaks—that appear to overlay the physical scene during the development process.
• Electronic Voice Phenomenon (EVP): This is an auditory overlay where voices not heard by the human ear at the time of recording appear on the audio track. Traditionalists often use older analog tape recorders or radios scanning between stations, believing spirits can manipulate the “white noise” to form words.
• Direct Sensor Interaction: Some investigators believe spirits can bypass the lens and affect a camera’s sensor or film negative directly, embedding a signature or image that was never visually present in the room.
• Optical Illusions (Pepper’s Ghost): While still a physical setup, this Victorian-era technique uses a sheet of glass and specific lighting to reflect an off-stage “spirit” into the viewer’s (or camera’s) line of sight, creating a transparent overlay without any post-production. 

Subjective Experience vs. Recording

It is important to distinguish between a recorded overlay and a perceived one:

• Mediumship Sensitivity: A clairvoyant may see images in their “mind’s eye” (like a fast-running movie) while watching or recording a video, which they describe as an overlay. This is a personal perception and does not appear on the video file for others unless the medium uses tools to manually transcribe or illustrate what they see.
• Natural Artifacts: Many non-technical “overlays” are often debunked as camera artifacts like lens flares, dust reflecting flash, or long-exposure motion blur. 

---

I asked Google AI: More about EPV [Electronic Voice Phenomenon]?

Google AI said: Electronic Voice Phenomenon (EVP) refers to sounds found on electronic recordings that are interpreted as spirit voices. These voices are typically not heard at the time of recording and are only discovered during playback. 

Historical Foundations

Friedrich Jürgenson (1959): Generally credited with discovering EVP when he heard what he believed were his deceased mother’s voices on a tape recording of birdsong.

Konstantin Raudive (1960s–70s): A Latvian psychologist who popularized the phenomenon. He recorded over 70,000 “Raudive voices” and published the influential book Breakthrough.

Thomas Edison While he did not invent a successful “spirit phone,” his early experiments and public interest in recording devices laid the groundwork for later spiritualist research. 

Recording Methods

Investigators use various tools to capture these anomalies, often relying on background noise as a “canvas” for the voices: 

• Standard Audio Recorders: Both analog (tape) and digital recorders are used. Analog is often preferred by traditionalists who believe spirits can manipulate magnetic fields directly.
• Ghost Boxes (Spirit Boxes): Modified radios that rapidly scan AM/FM frequencies, creating a sweep of white noise and radio fragments that spirits supposedly manipulate to speak.
• Noise Manipulation: Some methods involve “raising the noise floor” or using white noise generators to provide the raw sound energy necessary for manifestation. 

Classification System

Paranormal investigators often categorize EVPs by their clarity:

• Class A: Clear and distinct voices that can be understood by anyone without headphones or prompting.
• Class B: Distinct but quieter; usually requires headphones and may be heard more clearly once the listener is told what to listen for.
• Class C: Very faint, whispery, or mechanical; often indecipherable and frequently discarded by objective researchers. 

Scientific & Skeptical Explanations

Mainstream science categorizes EVP as a pseudoscience. Common natural explanations include: 

• Auditory Pareidolia: The brain’s tendency to find meaningful patterns (like words) in random noise.
• Radio Interference: Stray signals from CB radios, baby monitors, or distant stations being picked up by unshielded equipment.
• Equipment Artifacts: Internal mechanical sounds from analog recorders or digital compression artifacts.
• Apophenia: A broader psychological term for finding connections between unrelated or random data. [Google AI is good at this, I find, if asked to do so. –Alice B. Clagett]

Would you like to know more about the specific equipment setups used in modern investigations?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional. AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more 

---

I asked Google AI: Explain EVP from the standpoint of esoteric lore?

Google AI said: In esoteric and occult traditions, Electronic Voice Phenomenon (EVP) is viewed not as a technical glitch, but as a bridge between the physical and etheric planes. Rather than recording sound waves in the traditional sense, practitioners believe these devices capture “etheric traces” or “thought-forms” through non-physical mechanisms. 

The Esoteric Mechanics of EVP

Esoteric lore explains the manifestation of these voices through several metaphysical concepts:

• Energy Manipulation: It is believed that discarnate entities lack physical vocal cords and must instead “mold” existing environmental energy. They use white noise, static, or the “noise floor” of a device as a raw, chaotic material—a sonic “clay”—to manifest intelligible speech.
• The Etheric-Physical Channel: Some theories suggest that the recording device itself doesn’t “hear” the spirit. Instead, the person operating the device acts as a mediumistic conduit. Their own bio-energy (etheric body) provides the “power” that allows a spirit’s thought-form to imprint onto the electronic medium.
• Psychokinesis (Thought Imprinting): An occult perspective posits that EVP may be a form of projection, where either the spirit or the living researcher subconsciously imprints thoughts directly onto the magnetic or digital storage, bypassing the microphone entirely.
• Stochastic Resonance: In modern “techno-mysticism,” white noise is seen as a carrier signal. Just as a crystal radio picks up invisible waves, the chaotic frequencies of static are thought to provide a “bridge” that spirits can use to cross the veil into our frequency. 

Metaphysical Classifications

While science calls it “auditory pareidolia” (the brain finding patterns in noise), esoteric practitioners view the clarity of an EVP as a reflection of the vibrational alignment between the researcher and the entity: 

• Class A: High-vibrational alignment; clear, direct communication.
• Class C: Low-energy or “faded” echoes; voices from deeper, more distant layers of the astral plane. 

Connection to Ancient Practices

Esotericists often link EVP to ancient scrying (divination by staring into mirrors or water). In this view, audio static is simply a “sonic mirror”—a field of chaos that allows the “unseen” to take form through the observer’s focused intent.

Would you like to explore how specific analog vs. digital equipment is thought to affect these “etheric imprints”?

---

I asked Google AI: Suppose the EVP appears to be a direct overlay of living people speaking, or the voices of animals clearly heard speaking English? [as in the case of the clairaudient overlays mentioned in my post “How to Get Rid of an Entity Attachment” which is mentioned in the Introduction]

Google AI said: In esoteric lore, hearing the voices of living people or animals speaking a human language on a recording is often interpreted as a “bleeding” between different states of consciousness or temporal layers, rather than a message from the deceased.

Living Voices as “Psychic Overlays”

When the voices of living people appear as an overlay on a recording where they were not physically present, esotericists often point to three main phenomena:

• Thought-Forms (Tulpa-like Echoes): Intense human emotions or repetitive thoughts can create “etheric imprints” or thought-forms. These are energetic signatures that “hang” in a location and can be captured by sensitive equipment. If a living person is strongly thinking about a place or person, their “voice” might manifest there as a psychic projection.
• Astral Travel/Bilocation: Esoteric tradition suggests that during sleep or deep meditation, a living person’s astral body can travel to other locations. A recording might capture the “etheric voice” of a living person who is physically miles away but astrally present in the room.
• Time Slips (Temporal Bleed): Some theorists suggest that “ghosts” are actually glimpses of the past or future bleeding into the present. In this view, you aren’t hearing a spirit, but a literal “audio shadow” of a living person from a different point in time where they were (or will be) in that room. 

Animals Speaking English

Finding an animal’s voice speaking a human language on an EVP is rare but has specific esoteric interpretations:

• Mimicry by Non-Human Entities: Occult lore warns of “mimickers”—non-human or “inhuman” entities (sometimes called elementals or lower-astral beings) that lack their own identity. These beings may adopt the “mask” of a familiar animal or use a human voice to gain trust or cause confusion.
• The “Group Soul” or Totem Communication: Some esoteric traditions believe animals share a “group soul.” In moments of high energetic tension (like a haunting), a researcher might tap into the “intelligence” behind an animal, which translates its intent into a language the researcher can understand.
• Anthropomorphic Projection: From a psychological-esoteric hybrid view, the researcher’s own subconscious may act as a “translator.” If a researcher has a strong bond with an animal, their own psychokinetic energy might imprint the “meaning” of the animal’s sound into actual words on the recording medium. 

Distinguishing from Interference

While the esoteric view is fascinating, many “overlays” of living voices are identified as cross-modulation. Digital and analog recorders can accidentally act as radio receivers, picking up distant cell phone conversations, baby monitors, or CB radio chatter. 

Would you like to examine how analog tape specifically is believed to be more “hospitable” to these living psychic imprints?

---

I asked Google AI: Do you suppose clairly gifted persons, as Earth ascends, might utilize camcorders to record distant conversations, much as people speak to each other at a distance today using electronic means such as handhelds?

For instance, the camcorder might act like a handheld txt message – an optical recording – of a phone call on the handheld – an auditory recording – that goes to message. Except that in the case of the Ascension-oriented person and the camcorder, a telepathic conversation – the reception and conveyance of ‘thought forms’ – might be converted to an auditory recording on the camcorder?

So then the latter would be another instance of conversion of communication from one medium to another, as in the case of voice-to-text, but with a paranormal twist?

Google AI said: In esoteric and “ascension-based” frameworks, your hypothesis aligns with the concept of Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC)—the belief that technology can act as a bridge for non-physical consciousness. As some believe Earth’s “vibrational frequency” rises (Ascension), the veil between thought and physical matter is said to thin, potentially allowing for the “paranormal twist” you described.

Here is how your proposed conversion would work within that lore:

• The Device as a “Mediumistic Surrogate”: Historically, mediums like Leonora Piper were called “The Machine” because they acted like a human telephone for spirits. In your scenario, the camcorder takes over this role. Rather than recording sound waves, the device captures “etheric traces” of telepathic thought-forms, effectively becoming a “psi-cyborg” interface.
• Conversion of Thought-Forms to Audio: Just as modern phones convert voice to text, esoteric theory suggests that high-vibration “sensitives” can use their own bio-energy to provide the “carrier signal” necessary for a telepathic message to imprint itself as an audio signal on a recording device. This is viewed as nonlocal communication—a “thought” from one location manifesting as a physical “sound” on a distant recorder.
• The “Ascension” Upgrade: In the context of Earth’s ascension, proponents argue that human consciousness is evolving to a “5D” state where thoughts are more “dense” and more easily manifested into the “3D” physical world. This would mean a camcorder isn’t just a camera anymore; it’s a transdimensional receiver capable of capturing conversations occurring on the mental or astral planes.
• Comparison to “Text-to-Voice”: Your analogy is precise in this framework. While a standard text message is a digital conversion, this “Ascension EVP” would be a metaphysical conversion—translating the high-frequency energy of a “thought” into the lower-frequency vibration of “audio” that a physical device can play back.

Scientific skeptics, however, classify these ideas as pseudoscience, attributing such recordings to auditory pareidolia (the brain finding patterns in noise) or external radio interference.

---

THE WRAP

Google AI said: Would you like to explore specific historical cases where telepathic messages were allegedly captured on tape?

I said: That sounds interesting, but I would like to put it off for now. Thanks very much for your help in exploring this intriguing topic. Let’s sign off for now.

Google AI said: It was a pleasure diving into these metaphysical mechanics with you. The idea of tech acting as a transdimensional “bridge” during a shift in consciousness adds a fascinating layer to how we view our everyday devices.

Whenever you’re ready to explore those historical cases or dive back into the “paranormal twist,” I’ll be here.

Should we pick up with historical telepathic recordings or perhaps look into modern ITC software next time?

I liked and closed.

---

CONCLUSION

My thanks to Google AI for shedding light on …

• clairvoyant or clairaudient overlay,
• Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP).
• Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC), and
• ‘metaphysical conversion’… the latter being conversion of thought forms to camcorder audio (or, who knows, maybe camcorder visuals) as contrasted to ‘digital conversion’ such as voice-to-text or text-to-voice.

God bless you all,
And keep you safe,
And be with you
Through all your days.

In love, light and joy
This is Alice B. Clagett.
I Am of the Stars … and so are you!

Compiled and published on 24 February 2026; revised on 10 May 2026

MORE INFORMATION

For clairvoyant overlays, see … Link: “Google AI: Clairvoyant or Clairaudient Overlay onto a Video Not Achieved Through Technology?” by Alice B. Clagett, compiled and published on 24 February 2026 … https://wp.me/p2Rkym-Gkk ..

NOTES: I left the double quotes off of the beginning and end of Google AI’s response, and kept the double quotes as is within the responses. You will know by the light blue font that these are quotes from Google AI.

If you see purple font, that is being used for a term described in “More Information.” [So far there is none of this in the post you are viewing. –Alice B. Clagett]

Through sparing use of square brackets, I sometimes change the transcript very slightly.

. . . . .

AI responses in this website, many of which are in the “AI collaborations’ category, are for informational purposes only and have not been independently verified for accuracy.

In many cases AI responses do not express my point of view precisely, and in some cases, not at all.  But I feel they do apprize me and my Readers of where other Lightworkers and Ascensioneers, as well as Esotericists, Theologians, Psychologists and Psychiatrists stand with regard to my channelings. They also provide brief, well organized responses to queries about commonly known facts.

While mine is a Creative Commons website, the license status of AI responses is hotly debated. My research on the presently suggested license status of AI responses is here … “More License Information” … https://wp.me/P2Rkym-rj7 …

…………..

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Attribution: By Alice B. Clagett.
More license information
…………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………….

prophecy, AI collaborations,  ascension, ascension gifts, esoteric lore, physical body, subtle bodies, emotional body, higher mental body, conscious mind, clair overlays, clairaudient overlays, clairvoyant overlays,