Image: “Aloof & Alert,” adapted from Image by Amore Seymour from Pixabay – Pixabay License

• INTRODUCTION
• GOOGLE Q&A
  • I asked Google AI: My concern right now is to do with hackers who feel they are the person they are hacking. For instance, there might  be one, who forwards information on to five or more other people. So there might be six or more in all. I need to get a handle on their psychology. Can you help?
  • I asked Google AI: Parasocial?
  • I asked Google AI: Can you give me insights into [persistent group hacker] behavior? 
  • I asked Google AI: Virtual Reality Syndrome from a psychological perspective?
  • I asked Google AI: Virtual Reality Syndrome from a psychological perspective, and to do with a longtime group of hackers targeting one victim for character assassination and/or total extinction?
• CONCLUSION
  • Parasocial Personality Hacker Groups
  • Virtual Reality Syndrome
  • Gaslighting by Persistent Groups of Hackers
    • I asked Google AI: Gaslighting by a group of people who hack your computer?
  • Off with the PC, and Into the Great Outdoors
• MORE INFORMATION

---

 

INTRODUCTION

Dear Ones,

Below is an Aloof & Alert discussion on the psychological profiles of parasocial hackers. Google AI was, I feel, not replete with answers. However, we do have here a first step

Here is what Google AI has to say about it. These are the questions that are addressed …

---

 

GOOGLE AI Q & A

I asked Google AI: My concern right now is to do with hackers who feel they are the person they are hacking. For instance, there might  be one, who forwards information on to five or more other people. So there might be six or more in all. I need to get a handle on their psychology. Can you help?

Google AI said: When addressing individuals who engage in long-term, intrusive monitoring and exhibit a blurred sense of identity or ownership over your digital life, looking at established patterns in forensic psychology and cyber-behavior provides the best framework.

Rather than a formally recognized “virtual reality syndrome,” psychologists and cyber-intelligence professionals categorize these behaviors under known profiles of digital fixation and group dynamics.

Psychological Profiles of Digital Intruders

• Identity Fusion and Vicarious Living: In long-term intrusion cases, the actor often develops a parasocial or obsessive fixation. By monitoring your emails, bank accounts, and daily habits for years, they may experience “identity fusion”—where the boundary between their actual life and the life they are watching begins to blur. They adopt your accomplishments, platforms, and assets as their own to escape their own reality.
• Sense of Entitlement and Grandiosity: Intruders frequently rationalize their actions by convincing themselves that they have a right to your digital property. Over time, this rationalization warps into a genuine belief that your platforms (like your website or YouTube channel) only exist or succeed because of their presence or oversight.
• The “Shared Secret” and Echo Chambers: When a primary actor involves a small group (such as forwarding your information to five others), the dynamic changes from an individual obsession to a shared subculture. In these small groups, members validate each other’s actions. What might start as curiosity or an illicit thrill transforms into a shared narrative where they view your life as an ongoing “project” or entertainment source.
• Control and Power Dynamics: At its core, maintaining access to someone else’s private data is an exercise in asymmetrical power. Knowing details about your life that you don’t know they have access to creates a false sense of superiority and control.

Maintaining an Psychological Boundary

The most effective attitude to adopt is absolute digital and emotional non-existence to them. Actors who exhibit identity fusion thrive on any acknowledgment that confirms their impact on you.

• Starve the Echo Chamber: If the group of six is sharing your information, any change in your behavior, online posts, or visible reactions on your channels serves as “content” for them. By completely securing your systems and giving absolutely zero public or private acknowledgement of the situation, you break the feedback loop that keeps the group engaged.
• Expect an Extinction Burst: When an intruder realizes they have truly lost access and can no longer “be you,” they may initially try harder to get a reaction or re-establish contact. Recognizing this as a predictable psychological reaction—rather than a sign of their strength—helps you remain calm and non-reactive while your security measures hold them out. …

 

---

I asked Google AI: Parasocial?

Google AI said: A parasocial relationship is a one-sided psychological connection where an audience member or consumer feels a deep sense of friendship, intimacy, or knowingness with a public figure, fictional character, or AI chatbot who does not know they exist and does not reciprocate the bond. [1, 2, 3]

Key Characteristics

• One-Sided: You invest time, attention, and emotional energy into the person or character, while they are completely unaware of your individual existence.
• Illusion of Intimacy: Because media figures (such as podcasters, streamers, influencers, or actors) look into a camera, share personal details, or speak in a conversational tone, it triggers human social instincts to feel like you are actually friends.
• No Mutual Reciprocity: Real friendships require two-way communication and shared presence. Parasocial bonds lack this core feature. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Where the Term Comes From

• Origin: The term was coined in 1956 by American sociologists Donald Horton and R. Richard Wohl in a study on early television viewers and broadcast personalities.
• Modern Expansion: The concept expanded significantly through social media, YouTube, Twitch livestreams, and artificial intelligence, earning recognition as the Cambridge Dictionary Word of the Year. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Common Forms and Examples

• Celebrities & Influencers: Feeling like you “know” a musician, actor, or YouTuber personally because you follow their daily posts or vlogs.
• Fictional Characters: Becoming deeply attached to characters in a book series, anime, or television show.
• AI Chatbots: Interacting with artificial intelligence companions that simulate friendly, conversational behavior.
• Parasocial Breakups / Grief: Experiencing genuine sadness, anger, or mourning when a favorite creator stops posting, a show ends abruptly, or a public figure goes through a personal scandal. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] …
  

  ---

 

I asked Google AI: Can you give me insights into [persistent group hacker] behavior?  

Google AI said: When looking at scenarios where a group operates entirely in the background and targets an individual’s reputation or core values, behavioral researchers and cyber-intelligence specialists analyze these actions through the lens of group psychology and online subcultures.

Here are the insights into how these types of background group dynamics typically function:

Group Dynamics and Deindividuation

When individuals form a small group or participate in specific online forums (like an afternoon chat session), their personal sense of responsibility often decreases. This is known as deindividuation. Inside a closed group or forum, members feel anonymous. This anonymity lowers their social inhibitions, leading them to engage in hostile behaviors—such as organizing derisive threads or creating defamatory content—that they would never attempt as individuals in the physical world.

The Mechanics of “Trolling” and Value Targeting

In online subcultures, targeting someone with contrasting beliefs (such as traditional ethics) is often driven by a desire to provoke a reaction, a behavior commonly referred to as “trolling.”

• The Goal of Provocation: The primary motive is often to see if they can force a visible disruption in the target’s life or cause them to publicly break character.
• Shock Value: Creating extreme or scandalous claims (such as fabricated media) is a tactic used to generate shock value within their own group. For the actors, the satisfaction comes from the act of creation and the internal validation they receive from their peers, rather than the objective truth of the claim.

The Feedback Loop of Background Activity

Because these actions are described as happening in the background without direct confrontation, the group operates on a feedback loop that relies heavily on assumptions.

• They watch for any subtle change in your routine, your website updates, or your video uploads to guess if their actions are having an effect.
• If they see no change, no response, and no acknowledgement, the group lacks the “amusement” or validation they are seeking. Over time, when a target remains entirely unaffected and unreachable, the group dynamic typically loses momentum, as online subcultures possess very short attention spans and naturally migrate toward newer targets.

Maintaining Strategic Non-Engagement

From a behavioral standpoint, the most effective counterstrategy against background groups is maintaining a posture of absolute irrelevance to them. Treating the perceived activity as empty noise deprives the group of the reaction necessary to sustain their momentum. …

---

 

I asked Google AI: Virtual Reality Syndrome from a psychological perspective?

Google AI said: From a psychological perspective, virtual reality syndrome (cybersickness) is not just a physiological glitch of the inner ear—it is a complex phenomenon deeply tied to how our brains construct reality, process anxiety, and adapt behavior.

When evaluating VR sickness through a psychological lens, researchers and clinicians focus on several key areas:

1. Anxiety as a Multiplier and Mediator

Psychological research shows that pre-existing anxiety or situational stress significantly increases the severity of VR sickness. [1]

• Symptom Overlap: The physiological responses to anxiety (racing heart, dizziness, cold sweat, nausea) perfectly mimic the physical symptoms of cybersickness. [1, 2]
• The Feedback Loop: Studies published in journals like Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking have shown that anxiety acts as a mediator. If a user feels anxious about using the technology or gets anxious when they start feeling a little dizzy, that anxiety amplifies the physical symptoms, creating a compounding feedback loop that makes the sickness worse. [1, 2]

2. “Existential Hangovers” and VR Dissociation

Psychologists are highly interested in how VR temporarily disrupts a person’s sense of presence and reality testing. [1]

• Depersonalization and Derealization (DP/DR): Upon exiting a highly immersive VR environment, some users experience a mild increase in dissociative symptoms. This can feel like a “lag” in returning to reality, where the real world feels flat, artificial, or dreamlike (derealization), or your own physical hands feel like they don’t belong to you (depersonalization). [1, 2, 3]
• The “Emergency Brake” Hypothesis: Psychologically, dissociation acts as the brain’s defense mechanism against overstimulation. When a VR environment completely hijacks your visual and auditory fields with hyper-stimulating content, the brain can flip a psychological “emergency brake,” tuning out and detaching from the environment to protect itself. [1]

3. Locus of Control and Cognitive Expectancy

How much control a user perceives they have over their movement drastically alters their psychological comfort.

• Passive vs. Active Interactivity: Just like a passenger in a car is far more likely to get motion-sick than the driver, a VR user who has a low sense of agency over their movement is highly prone to syndrome symptoms.
• Expectancy Violation: According to psychological theories of expectancy violation, when your brain strongly expects a certain sensory consequence from a physical action (like walking forward) and receives an entirely different input, it triggers a cognitive conflict. The psychological effort required to constantly resolve this conflict leads to cognitive fatigue, frustration, and burnout. [1, 2]

4. The Proteus Effect and Identity Blurring

Long-term or intense psychological engagement in VR can trigger the Proteus Effect, where users behaviorally conform to the traits of their digital avatars. When a user experiences severe VR syndrome while embodying an avatar, the psychological distress can cause a jarring mismatch in self-identity upon returning to the physical self, complicating the cognitive transition back to reality. [1, 2]

Clinical Implications

This psychological intersection is a major hurdle for Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET), which is used to treat PTSD, phobias, and anxiety disorders. Clinicians must carefully balance keeping a patient immersed enough to confront their fears psychologically without triggering cybersickness, which can cause patients to drop out of therapy prematurely. [1, 2, 3]

Are you exploring this from a clinical perspective (like using VR for therapy) or are you interested in the everyday psychological effects of gaming and immersion? Let me know so I can tailor the details!

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional. AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more

---

 

I asked Google AI: Virtual Reality Syndrome from a psychological perspective, and to do with a longtime group of hackers targeting one victim for character assassination and/or total extinction? 

Google AI said: From a psychological perspective, framing the intense, disorienting effects of Virtual Reality Syndrome (cybersickness) within a scenario where a longtime group of hackers is targeting a single victim for character assassination or total destruction introduces profound psychological dynamics.

When immersive technology is weaponized or perceived as a tool for systematic harassment, the psychological impact shifts from a simple tech-induced malaise to severe psychological trauma.

1. Weaponized Sensory Overload and Psychological Torture

If hackers are intentionally manipulating a victim’s virtual environment, they can weaponize the known triggers of VR syndrome to inflict physical and psychological distress.

• Induced Vertigo and Disorientation: By subtly altering frame rates, introducing latent tracking delays, or forcing unexpected camera movements, attackers can intentionally trigger nausea, migraines, and intense vertigo.
• Psychological Breaking Point: Constant exposure to physical sickness combined with malicious virtual content can be used as a form of technological conditioning, designed to break down the victim’s psychological resilience, making them highly vulnerable to exhaustion and compliance.

2. Amplified Derealization and The “Gaslighting” Effect

VR syndrome naturally induces mild, temporary feelings of derealization (the feeling that the real world isn’t real). When a targeted hacking campaign is added to the mix, this psychological effect becomes deeply dangerous.

• Eroding Reality Testing: The combination of physical VR dissociation and a coordinated gaslighting campaign (where hackers alter digital files, manipulate communications, or spoof identities) can completely erode a victim’s ability to tell what is real.
• The Truman Show Delusion: The victim may begin to feel that their entire physical reality is being simulated, monitored, or controlled by the hackers. This blurring of the boundary between the virtual and real worlds can induce profound paranoia and a total loss of ontological security (faith that the world is as it appears).

3. Hypervigilance and Digital Enclosure

When a group seeks a victim’s “total extinction” (socially, financially, or psychologically), the virtual world ceases to be an escape and instead becomes a cage.

• Perpetual Threat State: Because the hackers are a “longtime group,” the victim operates under the assumption that every digital interface is compromised. This triggers a permanent state of hypervigilance. The autonomic nervous system remains trapped in a fight-or-flight response, which drastically lowers the body’s threshold for motion sickness and stress-induced nausea.
• Isolation and Character Assassination: If the hackers are actively destroying the victim’s reputation externally while tormenting them internally via VR/digital systems, the victim experiences a total collapse of social support. Psychologically, isolating a victim while simultaneously disrupting their sensory reality is an incredibly destructive combination that can lead to severe depression and a sense of absolute hopelessness.

4. Loss of Agency and the Trauma Response

A core component of managing VR syndrome is the “locus of control”—knowing you can take the headset off to make the sickness stop.

• The Trapped Presence: If a victim feels forced into digital environments (due to their work, financial dependence, or because the hackers have compromised their physical smart-home devices or essential tech), the inability to “disconnect” transforms a manageable physical ailment into a severe trauma response. The sickness becomes a physical manifestation of their lack of freedom.

Are you experiencing this yourself?
If you feel that you are being personally targeted, harassed, or monitored in this way, please know that you do not have to carry this immense stress alone. Coordinated harassment can take a massive toll on your physical and psychological well-being.

• Document everything: Keep a secure, offline log of dates, times, and specific technical anomalies.
• Disconnect safely: Take an extended, physical break from all digital screens, VR headsets, and internet-connected devices to let your nervous system reset and allow the physical symptoms of vertigo and nausea to clear.
• Reach out for real-world support: Connect with a trusted professional, a counselor, or local support networks who can provide a safe space to talk through what you are experiencing …

---

I liked and closed the thread.

---

CONCLUSION

Parasocial Personality Hacker Groups

This Google AI Q&A offers insight into parasocial personality hacker groups. By knowing what we may be dealing with in terms of psychological profiles in these instances, I feel each of us will be better prepared to be nonreactive and logical in response to these cybercrime intrusions.

Virtual Reality Syndrome

It’s important to understand that parasocial personality hacker groups likely suffer from Virtual Reality Syndrome. They may be suffering cognitive dissonance, and dissociation from reality, I feel. They may be feeling very anxious, and attempting to control the victim so as to allay their own anxiety and to quell their concerns about their cognitive issues and their emotional affect.

If a member, or several members of the group graduate into the Google AI Q&A mentor and AI development program, they may ascribe to you the emotions with which they themselves are dealing.

Gaslighting by Persistent Groups of Hackers

For instance, they may label you anxious, or hypervigilant, or in need of psychological counselling, when in fact they are at the effect of these difficulties. It is important to know that AI is not God; it runs on algorithms created by human beings. It is still in its younger years, and needs improvement. Hence the mentoring programs, I am presuming?

When someone tries to label you as mentally ill, then what is happening is called Gaslighting, or the Gaslight syndrome. It is important to understand when gaslighting is being used to manipulate us psychologically, and not to fall for this manipulation.

I thought to find some explanations of gaslighting online. A la the 1940 British “Gas Light” movie and the 1944 United States “Gaslight” remake of the movie, these explanations generally focus on couples relationships.

For instance, there is this interpersonal relationships video on Gaslighting … Video: “What is Gaslighting?” by Therapist Aid, 21 January 2025 … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIgGR4zmeRA .. 

And there is this PubMed on couples gaslighting … Link: “The gaslight syndrome,” by S.P. Kutcher, Can J. Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;27(3):224-7. doi: 10.1177/070674378202700310. …  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7093877/ ..

Also, you can check my blog category: Gaslighting ..

In addition to this, I feel there is a new cyber gang stalking gaslight phenomenon. So…

I asked Google AI: Gaslighting by a group of people who hack your computer?

Google AI said: Digital and cyber gaslighting occurs when technology, remote access, or compromised devices are manipulated to make you doubt your memory, perception, or sanity. When multiple people or coordinated entities are involved, the experience often blends technical intrusions with psychological manipulation. [1, 2, 3]

Common Tactics Used in Digital/Group Manipulation

• Account and File Tampering: Unauthorized access to change passwords, delete emails, alter documents, or manipulate messages so you cannot find a reliable paper trail. [1, 2]
• Device and Smart Home Control: Remote manipulation of connected hardware (such as smart home devices, phones, or computers) to create confusing environmental or functional anomalies. [1, 2, 3]
• Reality Distortion and Isolation: Convincing targets that events, conversations, or online interactions happened differently than they remember, or using fabricated digital evidence. [1, 2]
• Overlapping Harassment (“Gang-Stalking” Dynamics): In documented research on group-stalking perceptions, targets often report a mix of real or perceived digital compromises combined with synchronized real-world events designed to induce hypervigilance and distress …

Right on target, it it not?

Off with the PC, and Into the Great Outdoors

I intuit that parasocial hacks which persist over time involve the participants in telepathic shark fests with their human targets. The key to the door that opens into the victims’ minds is the on/off button on our computer or handheld.

In case of long-standing telepathic attack by the hackers, as technical deterrents are being set in place, if the tussle gets intense, turn that power button off and get out of your house or apartment, into the great outdoors.

A PC or Mac turned off for a week is one option to consider.

In love, light and joy
This is Alice B. Clagett.
I Am of the Stars … and so are you!

Io lux et pax nobiscum.
Joy, light and peace be with us!
— Alice B. Clagett

“Dominus illuminatio mea et salus mea; quem timebo?”
The Lord is my Light and my salvation; whom shall I fear?

Written and published on 2 November 2026

---

 

MORE INFORMATION

I left the double quotes off of the beginning and end of Google AI’s response, and kept the double quotes as is within the responses. You will know by the light blue font that these are quotes from Google AI.

If you see green font, I found that information of particular interest.

If you see purple font, that is being used for a term described in “More Information.”

I am using brown font for my questions in the Q&A. Also, through sparing use of square brackets and brown font, I sometimes change the transcript slightly or add my Comments to it.

. . . . .

AI responses in this website, many of which are in the “AI collaborations’ category, are for informational purposes only and have not been independently verified for accuracy.

In many cases AI responses do not express my point of view precisely, and in some cases, not at all.  But I feel they do apprize me and my Readers of where other Lightworkers and Ascensioneers, as well as Esotericists, Theologians, Psychologists and Psychiatrists stand with regard to my channelings. They also provide brief, well organized responses to queries about commonly known facts.

While mine is a Creative Commons website, the license status of AI responses is hotly debated. My research on the presently suggested license status of AI responses is here … “More License Information” … https://wp.me/P2Rkym-rj7 …

…………..

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Attribution: By Alice B. Clagett.
More license information
…………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………….

prophecy, AI collaborations, psychology, psychiatry, crime and crime prevention, cybercrime, telepathy, virtual reality syndrome, parasocial relationships, gaslighting, Lightworkers, Ascension, Ascension cautions, character assassination,