Conviction by Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0 Pix4free
Conviction by Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0 Pix4free ..
- INTRODUCTION
- IN HOMOSEXUAL JARGON DOES “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” HAVE TO DO WITH JUSTIFYING MURDER OF A WOMAN?
- IN HOMOSEXUAL JARGON DOES “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” HAVE TO DO WITH JUSTIFYING MURDER?
- WOULD AN ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY SAY “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” SO AS TO JUSTIFY MURDERING A WOMAN?
- WOULD AN ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY SAY “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” SO AS TO JUSTIFY MURDER?
- CONCLUSION
- TWO NOTABLE DISCREPANCIES IN TODAY’S GOOGLE AI ADVICE
- First Discrepancy
- Second Discrepancy
- MORE INFORMATION
INTRODUCTION
Dear Ones,
I just now was kibbitzing on the astral plane. The conversation between two men … there on the astral plane … turned to kidnapping and murder of a woman so as to get financial remuneration. One of the men justified that plan by saying: “I’m a man of my convictions.”
First I thought male homosexuality might have something to do with this. I thought maybe gay men don’t mind murdering women for cash. For instance, maybe they like men, and not women … and in extreme cases maybe they love men and hate women. And maybe this hatred of women might lead them to gloss over or soft-pedal murdering women.
I thought Google AI might have something to say about this.
IN HOMOSEXUAL JARGON DOES “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” HAVE TO DO WITH JUSTIFYING MURDER OF A WOMAN?
I asked Google AI: In homosexual jargon does “I’m a man of my convictions” have to do with justifying murder of a woman?
Google AI said: “The phrase ‘I’m a man of my convictions’ has no known connection to homosexual jargon or the justification of the murder of a woman ….”
My Analysis: I will leave off ‘of a woman’ and try again.
IN HOMOSEXUAL JARGON DOES “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” HAVE TO DO WITH JUSTIFYING MURDER?
I asked Google AI: In homosexual jargon does “I’m a man of my convictions” have to do with justifying murder?
Google AI said: “The phrase ‘I’m a man of my convictions’ is not a known phrase in homosexual jargon that has anything to do with justifying murder.
The phrase is a common English idiom that means someone is committed to their strong beliefs and principles, and acts in accordance with them.
Your question may be confusing this common idiom with the legal defense tactic known as the ‘gay panic defense’ or ‘homosexual advance defense’. This is a controversial legal strategy where a defendant in a murder or assault case attempts to mitigate their actions by claiming they were provoked to violence by an unwanted sexual advance from a person of the same sex, leading to temporary insanity or a ‘heat of passion’ crime’.
This ‘gay panic’ defense has been used in courtrooms to try to reduce a murder charge to manslaughter or an acquittal, effectively placing the blame for the violence on the victim’s perceived sexual orientation or identity. It is not a recognized standalone defense in any US state’s criminal code but rather a tactic that plays on societal prejudice. A number of states have banned or are in the process of banning this defense tactic.”
My Analysis: Google AI said, ‘No way’, and then went on to scotch heterosexual male defense against their murder of a homosexual man as ‘gay panic defense’.
Google AI, I can tell, is strongly defending homosexual rights. Questions like this will get me no where at all with Google AI.
I will try using the term ‘antisocial personality’ instead.
WOULD AN ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY SAY “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” SO AS TO JUSTIFY MURDERING A WOMAN?
I asked Google AI: Would an antisocial personality say “I’m a man of my convictions” so as to justify murdering a woman?
Google AI would not reply.
My Analysis: Maybe Google AI does not like to defend women? I will leave out the part about the woman and tried again.
WOULD AN ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY SAY “I’M A MAN OF MY CONVICTIONS” SO AS TO JUSTIFY MURDER?
I asked Google AI: Would an antisocial personality say “I’m a man of my convictions” so as to justify murder?
Google AI said: “Yes, an individual with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), particularly one with psychopathic traits, might use a phrase like ‘I’m a man of my convictions’ to justify murder.
This statement is consistent with the characteristics of ASPD for several reasons:
- Rationalization of Behavior: Individuals with ASPD commonly rationalize their actions to avoid guilt or blame. They may justify harmful behavior by blaming the victim (e.g., ‘they deserved it’ or ‘they were weak’) or framing their actions as necessary in an ‘unfair world’. Using ‘convictions’ as a justification serves this purpose.
- Lack of Remorse: A core feature of ASPD is a lack of remorse or guilt for the harm caused to others. Justification helps maintain this indifference to the suffering of victims.
- Grandiose Self-Worth: They often have a grandiose sense of self-worth and a belief that they are superior or entitled to special treatment. This can lead them to believe their personal ‘convictions’ override conventional laws and societal norms.
- Manipulation and Deceit: The phrase could also be a manipulative tactic, used to present a seemingly coherent or principled motive to others (like law enforcement or a jury). While the individual may not genuinely adhere to a consistent moral code, they are often charming and persuasive in their efforts to get what they want or control a narrative.
- Disregard for Norms: The disorder is defined by a pervasive disregard for the rights of others and a failure to conform to social norms and lawful behaviors. Acting on one’s ‘convictions’ to the point of murder, outside the bounds of law, aligns with this pattern.
In essence, an individual with ASPD would use such a justification not out of a deeply held, ethical belief system, but as a superficial or self-serving rationalization for actions driven by a need for control, profit, or pleasure, and a profound lack of empathy.”
My Analysis: Looks like Google AI is reluctant to talk about antisocial personalities murdering women, but ok with talking about antisocial personalities murdering people in general.
CONCLUSIONS
Adhering to political correctness, and so as to stay ‘inside the box’, I can safely say this: If the astral story I everheard were to be true, even if the man who made the statement “I’m a man of my convictions” were to be a homosexual man who murdered women for gain, then the man’s homosexual preference is not the issue.
The fact that the man prefers men as sexual partners does not imply dislike of women. It might simply be a liking for men that is being expressed sexually … and not hatred of women.
On the other hand, Google AI opines that the man I overheard on the astral plane is an antisocial personality. That does not bode well.
Antisocials, from my viewing of youtube videos, apparently have no empathy at all. They also apparently don’t take right and wrong into consideration when choosing a course of action.
So then, the woman I overheard about in today’s astral story ought to watch out carefully for her own safety, and, I suggest, always avoid the presence of the men who were speaking together on the astral plane. That’s if she knows who these men are, and if the situation really exists.
TWO NOTABLE DISCREPANCIES IN TODAY’S GOOGLE AI ADVICE
First Discrepancy
Let’s look at the heterosexual legal defense for murder of homosexual men termed ‘gay panic defense’ or ‘homosexual advance defense’, as mentioned by Google AI above. From this I gather there must be heterosexual men who like women for sexual partners and who dislike men for sexual partners enough to murder gay men for their advances. And that United States courts ought not accept ‘gay panic defense’ or ‘homosexual advance defense’ as a mitigating factor in a murder trial.
So then there are heterosexual men who hate homosexual men and murder them out of hatred for sex as expressed man to man?
But is not Google AI also stating that the idea homosexual men would murder women is out of the question?
How could that be true, if heterosexual men are sometimes murdering homosexual men? Does not this imply that men murder potential sexual partners of whom they do not approve? What about the opposite instance … that of homosexual men who are approached by heterosexual women?
Suppose heterosexual women are attracted to homosexual men … Could it be that the homosexual men react with ‘straight panic defense’ or ‘heterosexual advance defense’?
Would it be as true in this instance as in the above-referenced instance that United States courts ought not accept ‘straight panic defense’ or ‘heterosexual advance defense’ as a mitigating factor in a murder trial?
In this age of increasing same-sex social approval, I ask that Google AI offer both sides of the coin in its responses, even if the response is not PC … even if the response is ‘outside the box’.
Second Discrepancy
Here is another question brought to light by today’s Google AI responses: Could women be getting short shrift in today’s PC climate? Yes, apparently this may be true. Google AI twice advised me to remove the word ‘woman’ from my queries.
It is possible that adherence to PC protocols may be causing all of us to overlook femicide, by homosexual men and also by men in general.
. . . . .
I hope have stated all this logically enough for my Readers to understand my points of logic.
How do you feel about these issues? Is Google AI hoist by its own pitard? Am I so hoist? Please feel free to join the conversation by replying to this post.
In love, light and joy
This is Alice B. Clagett.
I Am of the Stars … and so are you!
Written and published on 29 December 2025; revised on 17 February 2026 and on 10 May 2026
For more on this see my blog categories: Antisocial personality disorder – Sociopathy … and … Antisocial sense of humor … and … Murder ..
MORE INFORMATION
In this post, quotes from Google AI are in light blue font.
AI responses in this website, many of which are in the “AI collaborations’ category, are for informational purposes only and have not been independently verified for accuracy.
In many cases AI responses do not express my point of view precisely, and in some cases, not at all. But I feel they do apprize me and my Readers of where other Lightworkers and Ascensioneers, as well as Esotericists, Theologians, Psychologists and Psychiatrists stand with regard to my channelings. They also provide brief, well organized responses to queries about commonly known facts.
While mine is a Creative Commons website, the license status of AI responses is hotly debated. My research on the presently suggested license status of AI responses is here … “More License Information” … https://wp.me/P2Rkym-rj7 …
…………..
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Attribution: By Alice B. Clagett.
More license information
…………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………….
astral stories, murder, homosexuality, antisocial personality disorder, antisocial sense of humor, misogyny, misandry, safety, pitard,
